Architecture for the Moment

As a preliminary project leading up to my graduation endeavor, I engaged in an extensive literature review resulting in the essay "Architecture for the Moment." This piece presents a perspective on the challenges confronting architecture, particularly examining the evolving landscape influenced by the network society. The focus centered on the changing role of time and its significance in our pursuit of significance and meaning.

Initially, the essay delves into portraying our contemporary society and the perils associated with the emergence of the capsular society (as outlined by Foucault, Lazzarato, Heidegger, and de Cauter). This exploration sets the stage for proposing a shift in perspective within the realm of architecture: a proposition that reconciles the seemingly opposing realms of art (negativistic perspectives from Schmitz and Krauss) and science (positivistic views from Mitchells and Novak), suggesting they are fundamentally intertwined. This argument is substantiated through an interpretation of Deleuze's philosophy, supported by examples drawn from diverse disciplines.

The essay aims to disrupt the prevailing dualistic structure by introducing philosophy as a third approach, one that is rooted in realism. It asserts that the interplay among these varied domains of thought shapes our position in the world, essentially defining our identity. Instead of aiming for absolute oppositions in thoughts and ideas, the essay advocates for an ongoing pursuit and creation. It proposes that architecture, uniquely positioned, should strive to serve as a platform offering diverse possibilities for its users.

For a comprehensive understanding of these arguments and analyses, the essay is available for reference in the "Documents" section above.